Independent public-signal report
Videoleap: AI Video Editor app review & ASO audit
Google Play · Video Players & Editors · Last audited
Videoleap: AI Video Editor has a strong public ASO foundation, but this report still identifies specific conversion, review and maintenance signals worth monitoring.
Executive answer
What does the public evidence say?
ASO health
Videoleap: AI Video Editor has a strong public ASO foundation, but this report still identifies specific conversion, review and maintenance signals worth monitoring.
User risk
5 sampled reviews point to payment as the strongest recurring complaint.
Maintenance signal
Videoleap: AI Video Editor was last updated 274 days ago, so the value model applies a material maintenance-risk discount.
Review intelligence
Sentiment and complaint concentration
Twelve-signal ASO audit
What is helping—and what should change?
Priority fixes
No update in 271 days
Google Play rewards a steady update cadence; a listing this stale slides down search and risks compatibility warnings.
Recommended actionShip a maintenance release and refresh the listing text at the same time.
Description looks keyword-stuffed
"video" makes up 6.3% of the description, above the ~3% level stores treat as spam.
Recommended actionRewrite the repeated phrase into natural sentences and use variations instead.
Signals already working
Review velocityHow many new public reviews arrive per month12.5/month
Developer reply rateShare of sampled reviews the developer has answered100%
ScreenshotsImages shown on the store listing8
Localized marketsMarkets where the listing is actually translatedNot checked yet
ASO keyword map
Main keyword candidates for Videoleap: AI Video Editor
Inferred from public title and description relevance. These are not private search-volume, conversion-rate or live-ranking claims.
video
videoleap
editor
maker
videos
generator
reel
creator
enhance
quality
reels
create
Indicative public-signal value
Not published for this app
Public-signal valuation is unavailable for major enterprise brands because private revenue, ownership and financial data is required.
Evidence excerpts
What users are reporting
Quoted verbatim from public Google Play reviews. Each carries the rating, date and app version it was left on, so it can be checked against the listing.
“Absolutely ridiculous app not worth paying for. It's full of GARBAGE templates uploaded by users especially from India. Once you choose a template, it's nearly impossible to cha...”
“Too hard to use... All I wanted to do was remove one object from a video, and I couldn't figure out how to do it. The ad I saw for this app said it could do that, but I tapped e...”
“Twice.Now, it has happened where they have tried to make me subscribe twice.And once again , i'm being told , I have no purchases to restore despite having a subscription that d...”
“this app often gives water marks even when u have paid 1 whole year of subscription. The CC team does not revert even after multiple pings or communications”
“it used to be good, but now it doesn't upload my videos and gives an error. Just requested a refund”
“Videoleap used to be probably the best videoediting platform on mobile before Capcut. Then lightricks started putting things behind paywalls as the default quality of the app gr...”
Neither store provides a link to an individual review, so these quotes cannot be deep-linked. They can be verified in the app's public reviews on Google Play using the rating and date shown. If you own this app and believe a quote is misattributed, tell us and we will re-audit it.
Keep comparing
Related evidence
More from Lightricks Ltd. and Video Players & Editors
Clear answers
Questions about Videoleap: AI Video Editor
What is the ASO score for Videoleap: AI Video Editor?
Videoleap: AI Video Editor scored 84 out of 100 in Bright App Data's twelve-signal public listing audit. The score covers listing copy, media, reviews, update cadence, privacy and localization signals.
What problems are users reporting about Videoleap: AI Video Editor?
The strongest detected complaint cluster is payment, supported by 5 matching sampled reviews. The report shows issue counts and available excerpts.
What are the main ASO keyword candidates for Videoleap: AI Video Editor?
The strongest visible-listing candidates are video, videoleap, editor, maker, videos. These are inferred from public title and description relevance, not private search-volume or ranking data.
When was Videoleap: AI Video Editor last audited?
This Bright App Data report was last audited on Aug 3, 2026. Store listings and review patterns change over time, and reports are refreshed automatically as the catalog re-checks each listing.
Why is there no estimated value for Videoleap: AI Video Editor?
Public-signal valuation is unavailable for major enterprise brands because private revenue, ownership and financial data is required. The ASO audit, review complaint clusters and maintenance signals on this page are unaffected.
Does Bright App Data have private analytics for Videoleap: AI Video Editor?
No. Bright App Data uses public app-store listing and sampled review evidence. It does not claim access to private conversion, retention, revenue or developer-console data.
What the store itself requires
Google Play rules that apply to Videoleap: AI Video Editor
Quoted from Google Play's own documentation, with the source for each. These are the published requirements — we report what the public listing shows against them and never assert a violation we cannot see.
Target API level 36 by 31 August 2026
Google Play requires new apps and updates to target Android 16 (API level 36) from 31 August 2026. An existing app below API 35 is only served to new users on devices running at or below its target version, so it quietly stops reaching modern phones.
What this report can see: We can see how long ago this app last shipped an update. We cannot see its target API level — that is only visible in Play Console.
Android Developers — target API level requirementsCrash and ANR thresholds affect store visibility
Google Play may reduce an app's visibility and show a warning on its listing when the user-perceived crash rate passes 1.09%, or the ANR rate passes 0.47%, on a 28-day average. The per-device-model thresholds are 8% for both — an app can look healthy overall and still be failing on one popular handset.
What this report can see: We can see what users report about crashes and device compatibility in public reviews. We cannot see the actual vitals numbers.
Android Developers — Android vitalsStore listing metadata rules
Titles are capped at 30 characters and may not use emoji, repeated special characters, ALL CAPS outside a brand name, or claims about rankings or pricing. Descriptions may not carry unattributed user testimonials or excessive keyword repetition.
What this report can see: All of this is on the public listing, so these checks are fully evidenced.
Google Play — store listing and promotion policyVerified against Google Play documentation on . Store requirements change — check the linked source before acting on a deadline.
Reviewed by Bright App Data. The report uses public app-store listing and sampled review evidence. Private conversion, retention and revenue data are never guessed. App owners can dispute, correct or refresh this report.
Read the methodology